|
THE MISSION of The Protection
and Advocacy program at University Legal Services ("ULS")
is to ensure that people with disabilities are afforded
the full rights and entitlements accorded to them by
local and federal law. Among these rights are the right
to self-determination, to be free from harm, to be afforded
due process, to develop physically, emotionally and
intellectually, and to be included in community life
with the opportunities and choices these rights imply.
OBJECTIVES:
1. To advocate for successful inclusion in
community life.
a. Promote full accessibility of public accommodations,
housing, polling places, and other government- funded
programs for people with mobility, hearing, and visual
disabilities;
b. Investigate abuse and neglect complaints and instances
where there is probable cause to suspect abuse or neglect;
c. Advocate for appropriate services and supports through
the Evans v. Fenty litigation;
d. Provide outreach and education to administrative
and policy-making bodies, advocates, and the community
to promote self-determination, consumer choice, and
high quality services in the most integrated appropriate
setting;
e. Advocate that the Developmental Disabilities Administration
and DC Medicaid promote self-determination and consumer
choice and provide quality services and supports;
f. Work through litigation, advocacy, and collaboration
to ensure that all persons with developmental disabilities
have access to services in the most integrated community
settings, including those persons transitioned to the
community from institutions under the Money Follows
the Person Grant and under the DDA Medicaid Waiver program;
g. Monitor and enforce the Young v. D.C. Housing Authority
consent order requiring the construction and renovation
of 565 fully wheelchair-accessible public housing units,
among other improvements;
h. Advocate for the appropriate services and inclusion
in the community for individuals who are dually diagnosed
with a mental illness and an intellectual disability;
i. Advocate for appropriate services and supports through
the ULS v. St. Elizabeths litigation;
j. Advocate against the improper use of seclusion,
restraint, and medication at facilities where DC residents
receive services.
2. To advocate for the rights of children.
a. Advocate for appropriate special education services,
provided in DCPS schools, and Medicaid services for
children at-risk of institutionalization without appropriate
supports;
b. Advocate for the inclusion of children in their
community schools;
c. Continue to represent the plaintiffs in Petties
v. District of Columbia to ensure that class members
receive safe and appropriate transportation services
and that the District of Columbia Public Schools timely
pays providers serving class members;
d. Provide outreach and education to administrative
and policy-making bodies, advocates, and the community
to promote the inclusion of children in the least restrictive
environment and to advocate for the provision of appropriate
special education services;
e. Educate policy-making bodies and the community on
best practices related to seclusion and restraint in
schools serving DC residents;
f. Present one or two training sessions on special
education to members of the DC bar and complete the
DC Bar pro bono intake referral forms to facilitate
pro bono representation of children in need of special
education advocacy.
3. Client appreciation
a. To host an outreach event awards program to highlight
the work of the program and to bring together people
with disabilities to celebrate their accomplishments.
CASE SELECTION CRITERIA:
1. Cases related to the protection of the legal and
human rights of individuals with developmental disabilities
and which fall within the aforementioned objectives;
and
2. Cases in which the client is a resident of the District
of Columbia.
While we recognize that every situation is important,
please note case acceptance is dependent upon available
resources, including staff time. If your case is not
accepted and you wish to file a grievance, submit your
grievance in writing to the Executive Director. The
Executive Director shall respond to any client grievance
in writing within thirty days of receipt. A client may
appeal the Executive Director’s decision to the
ULS Board of Directors within ten days of the written
decision of the Executive Director. The decision of
the ULS Board of Directors shall be final and not subject
to further appeal or review.
Jane Brown, Executive Director
University Legal Services
220 I Street, N.E., Suite 130
Washington, D.C. 20002
(202) 547-0198 Telephone
(202) 547-2662 Facsimile
(202) 547-2657 TTY
|